RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:NMIBC Ph. 1b trial shows up first in Canadian Cancer Trials Ahhh, ya, i want a pat on the back, ive been saying the same thing for months!!! And ive always said, why hasnt Roger said that once since Nov 8 to us??? Why is it up to u and others here to drum up interest and to show how great our results really are??? As for who is responsible for our sp???? Warrants, manipulators, day traders, all the things that will increase with a pp, and disappear, to dramatically decrease with pharma on board!!! Cmon lemmings u still havent answered my question, ur just like the crickets! THINK FOR URSELF! U HAVE A MIND, HUMANS ARE SUCCESSFUL BECAUSE THE IDENTIFY PATTERNS, MAKE SENSE OF THEIR ENVIRONMENT, DEDUCE AND CONCLUDE! BE HUMAN, Think!!
Eoganacht wrote: Does anyone know a cancer treatment that brings about the complete destruction of cancer permanently after one treatment? Why should Theralase be expected to produce that result in their
safety trial?
We got very good results - 90 days non-recurrence, 180 days non-progression in 3 out of 3
low dose patients with
no significant adverse affects. Our stock lost half it's value for no rational reason.
In our
efficacy trial we will be able to administer several treatments to a single patient, the immune effect should kick in and we should see a substantial number of complete responses.
jojomarch wrote: The way I see it is that P1-4 have passed safety and tolerability. P1-3 had recurrence at 180 days but chances are the recurring cells never absorbed the compound therefore were not destroyed when initially treated . Now P4 has received double the dose than the first three patients now we wait for the public release ( interpretation ) of the results for 180 days . Maybe the double dose was the key for success if so the stock market and big pharma will react . GLTA