RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:TLTIndeed u are the fool, not talking about our results, our science! of course pharma would balk if it was only about CHRONIC KNEE PAIN! BUT IT AINT CHUMP!! AND DO U THINK, PHARMA DOESNT HAVE THEIR GAGGLE OF LAWYERS AND IN THEIR BID, CLAUSES WILL BE INCLUDED THAT WILL try to CONTROL THE MOM AND POP BEHAVIOUR THEY SEE GOING ON, BUT ARE WILLING TO WORK WITH BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN FORCED TO BID NOW because they see and realize the importance of A SCIENCE WITH SO MUCH PROMISE????? So, yasufukkkkkinmoron, pharma , in their bid, will have some clauses to be considered and wil cause , Nr Part Trois. Tlt is pleased to announce that the number and complexity of the bids requires greater scrutiny, and in that regard the final decision for a jv has been pushed back to June 15!!!!!!! Then our share price goes over 30 dollars!!! Its about the hype, yaz you know what hype is, that thing that has been missing here for over 12 months, that thing that a ceo is supposed to be in front of, that thing that make sp pop, that thing that start the buzz!!!! Its about our science, our results, and why they have been muzzled!!! quote=bionicjoe]Macman1519, if you think about it a PP appears to be RW's only alternative. You are asking big pharma to bankroll TLT but if the management is as untrustworthy as you have made them out to be, would big pharma want to get involved? Consider too that half their $5 million a year losses are directly tied to their pain therapy division. Would big pharma want to use their money to support the sale and distribution of a machine used to treat knee pain? If you go to TLT's website you'll see a sizable gaggle of people needing to be paid for their services. Big pharma money might hesitate having to pay for that crowd. It's unlikely RW would allow them to cherry pick where their money goes. If it was just for cancer research then what about the pain therapy division? Hold a PP just for the TLC-2000? Unlikely. [/quote]