RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:So is Frost converting $0.54 warrants?Faking it??? like fake news, like u saying a JV would not want to spend money on research?? Fake news like our treatment is like orange juice, both would have had the same results!!! Fake news like no cancer before treatment but cancer after treatments, those were ur words yaz, not the spin u gave later!!! Fake news like everybody should call Roger if we want appropriate info!!! Those are all ur words yaz, and i dont know what is going on here??? I'LL TELL U WHAT I DONT UNDERSTAND!!!!!! I dont understand stealth mode!! I dont understand no pr!!! I dont understand botched N Rs !!!!! I dont understand no media blitz on a personal level by Roger, our ceo and SUPPOSEDLY HEAD cheerleader!!! I dont understand why our results have been minimized!!! Those are things i dont understand??? I have been pleading with posters here to enlighten me!!! To explain these things to me so they make sense in the grand scheme of things. I have asked to be inboxed with the exlanations if some are too shy!!!! With all my pleading, begging, yearning for knowledge, i am unsatisfied, probably like someone at HEAD office!! :-))))))))) But, yaz, i keep hoping, praying, even rubbing my lucky rabbits foot, in the optomistic belidf that Roger will soon release the nr we are all waiting for!!! Interesting that some hope for a pp, others a jv??? Are they so close to each other in value???? Now there is a discussion i have attepted to get going for months and months!!! CRICKETS, HAS BEEN MY ANSWER!!! WHY CRICKETS ABOUT THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE FACING THIS COMPANY????? WHY ARE PEOPLE FEARFUL, OR AVOIDING COMPARING A JV WITH A PP????? PEOPLE FEARFUL OUR RESULTS ARENT GOOD ENOUGH????? THEY ARE BELIEVING THE SCUMBAG MANIPULATORS WHO HAVE BROUGHT US HERE!!! WHAT OTHER PHARMA HAS DONE WHAT WE DID WITH OUR FIRST THREE PATIENTS??????? THAT IS A FACT!!!!! NOTHING FAKE THERE, YAZ, I UNDERSTAND THAT FACT BERRY, BERRY GOOD!!!
bionicjoe wrote: macman1519 wrote: Spinmaster, nice try!!! Cancer free and then they had cancer?? Whe treat them if cancer free at start?? Those were ur words not mine, and now ur spinning again, ur a chameleon, fitting into ur environment!! Now the spinner becomes the whirling dervish!!! Spin, yaz spin!! See the hammering the market is taking, dommage we didnt have a jv already in our back pocket, huh, yaz?????
bionicjoe wrote: Perhaps the piece de resistance!!! Yaz said, our first three patients had no cancer, were treated, and then they had cancer!! Yup, actually thought he could pass that through the lemmings, like the rumpie supporters, they dont read too good !! To busy back and forthing with their cousins!!!!
Of course they were visible tumor free macman1519. You don't think the world class doctors at PMH would allow patients that had visible tumors to be enrolled and treated in TLT's trial do you? That means all the data for the last year would be contaminated as there would be no way to know if the patient's 180 day cancer recurrence was due to visible tumors that were already there or if the treatment just didn't work. Are you suggesting PMH blew it and didn't allowTLT's treatment to be applied to a " clean " inner bladder wall? Try to do some DD for a change.
You're not faking it are you macman1519?
You really don't know anything about the NMIBC clinical trial.
This is what you get when you make no effort to understand what you are investing in.