RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:New CEO?Bunge wrote: bencro wrote: another of these clowns that thinks that because Roger is out as a CEO, that the stock will fly differently!
No one suggested it would fly JUST because Roger wasn't CEO.
Some, like me, suggested bringing in a well known CEO with HUGE street cred and an awesome track record in drug trials and past successes.
How it went down and the insertion of an interim CEO out of necessity was not what people were saying would make us "fly".
But, you know that don't you?
AGREE!We just need a CEO who cares about how to protect the long shareholders ' investment value even somebody claimed they just bought too damn early like 4 years ago and seldom trade yet every time average down no matter how hard hit by RW's sex partner 's dirty cheap pennies... As a long shareholders we deserve the protection of our initial value even if not getting any rewards for the long-term holding, not to be punished and betrayed by the pharking stupid management again and again..and again. Yet RW did that controversly by rewarding basement idiot's pharking boss yet punished his royal shareholders. Can we all ask :what is the Fu(k????