RE:RE:Cannabinoid Jjm, the more people explain this, the smellier it gets. Instead of asking for one bid from anyone, tlt ignores previous successes, that show 100% kill rate, and decides to go with a weed experiment that gets 35% kill rate.
then we crow about it, and say that is the direction we are going. Screw the 100%, 3 5% , looks better?????
Is that about right? You are right, jjm, the terms better be good!!!! All the choir last two days have been minimizing agan, the old, wait 2 or 4 years, macer and bbbhenny have been doing each other with glee, knocking down our phase 1 efficacy. The pp pushers are trying their hardest to soft bash tlt.
Personally, a bidding war would have been cleaner.
Going to give the good doctor the benefit of the doubt, that he is trying to protect our science as long as he can, but
Terms better be good!!
enriquesuave wrote: The 10% efficacy was just because they brought down he concentration of TLD-1433 real low in order to evaluate the synergistic effect of both. If they had kept it higher then it alone would have caused100% destruction and no way to know effect of cannabinoid. So maybe they can used about 1/3 -1/2 of the intended dose of TLD-1433 when combined in order to get full 100% effect. A much safer dose all together.IMHO
jojomarch wrote: So let me get this straight , 2 weeks ago we are told that our lead compound is destroying tumors and brain cancer stem cells . Then yesterday they tell us only 10 % efficacy but " lo and behold " combined with cannabinoid this new milkshake is 35% efficient wich is 5% greater than what is considered the pass line for commercialization at the FDA . All this happens when TLT is in need of capital and " lo and behold " the cannabis company is flush with cash . I wish I had timing like that . The terms better be good .
GO TLT GO
GO AM GO
GO JV GO
GO CANNA PHARMA GO
HAPPY WEDNESDAY