RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:I wonder what the
impala: They had to take it... but the reason they has to bring mackie in in the first place is because roger burned too many investors on previous financings. I have tons of emails from Roger talking about how we were going to do a financing at X, then when the stock went to 1.50+/- raise another 25 million or whatever the figure was that day. He misled too many pppl and investors stopped trusting him. So, yes, they had to take the 17 million at .30, but you need to look at the reason they had to it. Nobody trusts roger in the financial community. In regards to the options granted, I would have been fine it they were at 1.00 which would give them an incentive to perform, but 15-20% below the PP near the 52 week low is criminal. I believe in ppl being paid on performance, not compensated for doing a bad job... if that is soft bashing, I guess I am guilty... G1