RE:RE:Data @6-month ...Vestor111 ... We all know, as it's been documented by TLT in 2014, that PDT/PDC stimulate the immune system and activates the "eat me / don't eat me" signal, which can prevent recurrences. The first link below from TLT documents that clearly.
But there are other papers that on top of PDC/PDT, only refer to PDT (without PDC). But it's not clear whether or not at that moment that they use PDT while still meaning PDT/PDC.
There are simply too many excerpts in the following links that we could discuss. In the meantime, all these links seem to at least support why, in part or all together, we still have p#5 and p#6 cancer after 540+ days.
But if there's no cancer cells left before the 2nd treatment @6-month, that would mean that our TLD-1433 would not be absorbed. So light activation would not stimulate anything as there would have been not PDC absorbed.
But would light alone still stimulate immune response? We'll leave that to science and scientists. But the recent findings of TLT regarding to the reversal of the Warburg effect (with just light from its CLT technology (therapeutic) could come as additional support to such claim.
Interesting times ahead, no matter what.
________________
vestor111 - (12/12/2019 6:02:27 AM) RE:Data @6-month ... Catching up on posts. Ben could you clarify this statement you made? I had not heard this nor do I understand the underlying mechanism for such a claim. Any insights would help.
"And PDT alone can stimulate the immune ssytem."
Perhaps in some PDCs that are unstable?
My understanding, as with most immune responses with PDCs, that immune cells - largely made of of T-Cells, witness the cellular debris from the PDC activation. This debris has cancer mutation markers that have been cloaked to the immune system and are now exposed. The markers can include things such as DNA (perhaps even RNA) mutations and/or certain foreign proteins, that the T-Cells now recognize as foreign and pursue.
One additional point, recall one ot the findings of the recent paper, recently posted from May 2019, on GBM, ALA (a PDC) showed little to no T-Cell activity whereas 1433 showed considerable T-Cell activity related to the GSM tumors. Granted both were post activation but in either case, ALA appears to have not stimulated a response.
This was a very important finding - aided by photographic evidence.
Although we may not see eye to eye on a number of things beyond the realm of TLT, I do respect your digging into the research and bringing it to the boards attention and have often noted that.
Read more at https://stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/v_tlt?symbol=v.tlt&postid=30444787#2QcWP7pXLXZ1gxQJ.99
Anyone feel free. I know there is more than one poster here with a med background.
The essence of the question: How can a PDC stimulate an immune response without activation?