Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Theralase Technologies Inc. V.TLT

Alternate Symbol(s):  TLTFF | V.TLT.WT

Theralase Technologies Inc. is a Canada-based clinical-stage pharmaceutical company. The Company is engaged in the research and development of light activated compounds and their associated drug formulations. The Company operates through two divisions: Anti-Cancer Therapy (ACT) and Cool Laser Therapy (CLT). The Anti-Cancer Therapy division develops patented, and patent pending drugs, called Photo Dynamic Compounds (PDCs) and activates them with patent pending laser technology to destroy specifically targeted cancers, bacteria and viruses. The CLT division is responsible for the Company’s medical laser business. The Cool Laser Therapy division designs, develops, manufactures and markets super-pulsed laser technology indicated for the healing of chronic knee pain. The technology has been used off-label for healing numerous nerve, muscle and joint conditions. The Company develops products both internally and using the assistance of specialist external resources.


TSXV:TLT - Post by User

Comment by Eoganachton Jul 25, 2022 5:17pm
215 Views
Post# 34849432

RE:RE:RE:RE:What happened to radachlorin pdt for NMIBC?

RE:RE:RE:RE:What happened to radachlorin pdt for NMIBC?I found some more up to date results and it seems radachlorin does not have as good a durable response as the Korean study indicated. It's more like 35% at 2 years not 60%.- which is still good but not incredible.

"In particular, the TURB + PDT treatment with ALA and “Radachlorin” provided 78% and 91% complete response rates, respectively, at 12 months after follow-up [4,8]. However, by two years, the recurrence rate achieved for the “Radachlorin” group was 35%"

https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/1/233


ScienceFirst wrote: They never got FDA approval because they never did a Ph. 2 in the US.  


 
 
...
 
 

Although ALA-PDT is yet to be approved for use as a treatment for bladder cancer, it is a highly accurate and minimally invasive procedure that is widely applicable and may replace Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) intravesical therapy for bladder CIS.

In addition to 5-ALA, HAL, and a hematoporphyrin derivative Photofrin® (porfimer sodium), various photosensitizers have been examined for use in PDT for bladder cancer. They include Fotolon® (chlorin e6), which is nonaromatic, unlike porphyrin, as well as a chlorine derivative, Radachlorin®.47

July 2013:
 
 
 

Materials and Methods:

Between July 2009 and December 2011 photodynamic therapy was performed in 22 men and 12 womenRadachlorin (0.5 to 0.6 mg/kg) was injected intravenously 2 to 3 hours before photodynamic therapy. After complete transurethral resection, a diffuser using a 22Fr cystoscope was placed in the bladder for irradiation with a 662 nm laser. Output beam power was adjusted to 1.8 W and the light dose was 15 J/cm2. Photodynamic therapy was performed for 16 to 30 minutes. Recurrence after photodynamic therapy was followed by regular cystoscopy at 1, 2 and 3 months, and at 3-month intervals thereafter for up to 2.8 years. Efficacy was assessed by cystoscopy, cytology and histology, and defined as the number of patients who were tumor free after initial photodynamic therapy.

 

Results:

Mean ± SD patient age was 62.94 ± 8.71 years. Average followup was 26.74 ± 6.34 months (median 28.12). As the primary efficacy outcome, the recurrence-free rate was 90.9% at 12 months, 64.4% at 24 months and 60.1% at 30 months. As the secondary efficacy outcome, there was no statistical difference in mass size, carcinoma in situ, number of previous bacillus Calmette-Gurin administrations, number of transurethral bladder resections or tumor multiplicity on Kaplan-Meier analysis (each p >0.05). No evidence of severe adverse effects was detected after photodynamic therapy.

 

Conclusions:

Photodynamic therapy with Radachlorin is a safe, effective treatment for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer refractory or intolerant to bacillus Calmette-Gurin therapy in select patients.
 

June 2020:
 
 
It is not FDA approved:
 
Fig. 1.
 
Radachlorin® MHRF approved 662 Russia Skin
 
TLD-1433 Ru Phase 2 520 Canada Bladder, brain
 


or bladder cancer, it is a highly accurate and minimally invasive procedure that is widely applicable and may replace Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) intravesical therapy for bladder CIS.

In addition to 5-ALA, HAL, and a hematoporphyrin derivative Photofrin® (porfimer sodium), various photosensitizers have been examined for use in PDT for bladder cancer. They include Fotolon® (chlorin e6), which is nonaromatic, unlike porphyrin, as well as a chlorine derivative, Radachlorin®.47

July 2013:
 
 
 

Materials and Methods:

Between July 2009 and December 2011 photodynamic therapy was performed in 22 men and 12 womenRadachlorin (0.5 to 0.6 mg/kg) was injected intravenously 2 to 3 hours before photodynamic therapy. After complete transurethral resection, a diffuser using a 22Fr cystoscope was placed in the bladder for irradiation with a 662 nm laser. Output beam power was adjusted to 1.8 W and the light dose was 15 J/cm2. Photodynamic therapy was performed for 16 to 30 minutes. Recurrence after photodynamic therapy was followed by regular cystoscopy at 1, 2 and 3 months, and at 3-month intervals thereafter for up to 2.8 years. Efficacy was assessed by cystoscopy, cytology and histology, and defined as the number of patients who were tumor free after initial photodynamic therapy.

 

Results:

Mean ± SD patient age was 62.94 ± 8.71 years. Average followup was 26.74 ± 6.34 months (median 28.12). As the primary efficacy outcome, the recurrence-free rate was 90.9% at 12 months, 64.4% at 24 months and 60.1% at 30 months. As the secondary efficacy outcome, there was no statistical difference in mass size, carcinoma in situ, number of previous bacillus Calmette-Gurin administrations, number of transurethral bladder resections or tumor multiplicity on Kaplan-Meier analysis (each p >0.05). No evidence of severe adverse effects was detected after photodynamic therapy.

 

Conclusions:

Photodynamic therapy with Radachlorin is a safe, effective treatment for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer refractory or intolerant to bacillus Calmette-Gurin therapy in select patients.

 



<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>