RE:RE:Let me try again.....Rumpl3StiltSkin wrote: Fred, I don't think it matters as I believe they are using the correct and full data to apply for BTD and AA. If they have some new way of presenting the data moving forward? I guess as long as the FDA and other regulators are ok with it why not? At least it eliminates the 12 undertreated. That doesn't mean they didnt mess up the swimmers plot. It is very confusing to me.
Math is simple, but there still needs a few details to be clarified. Last November 51 patients had been treated in PH2 plus they were counting the 3 from PH1 for a total of 54. Now they have not mentioned 3 from PH1 and are simply stating that 57 patients have been treated in PH2. Plus they are removing patient that died, so a total of 56 patients ( includes 12 undertreated patients). Swimmers plot includes 12 under treated at 90 days, but not going forward. Chart also shows how 12 are included in evaluable patients at 90 days , but not going forward at other time points. They are still others probably for safety evaluation, but will be removed eventually completely. IMO