RE:RE:RE:72% CR at any point in time.wildbird1 wrote: NotinKansas, you start your post exactly the same way that greaterfoolfred does, by saying something that is misleading.
You pretend that the NR patients collect at the bottom. How do you explain patient 22 , this patient is NR from 90 days up to 360 days, and he is not at the bottom of the Swimmer plot.
And there is absolutely no mention anywhere in any Pressrelease that say that the NR patients are send at the bottom of the Swimmer list.
It's obvious from chart and swimmers plot mirrors chart. 52 patients plus 4 non evaluable patients for a total of 56. Includes 12 undetreated at 90 days. Other time points the 12 under treated were removed. Now if in another trial patients were to be given 100 mg of a drug, but 12 patients were wrongly given 15-59 mg ( or 15-59% of intended dose), why in the hell should they be included in final data? Only to be used in safety analysis perhaps? That's what happened with the 12 under treated. It was just a matter of time before removal from data. IMHO