RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:New Press Release - Theralase(R) Releases 1Q2023 Interim Financial Statements
Thanks NotinKansas.
My problem is my brain does not work in that fashion. The chart on the left side represents to me that there are 58 patients being tracked. I would like to think that they are Patients #1 to Patient #58 by order of enrolment -- to me that is straight forward - and the bottom of the chart kind of suggests that, by the arrows depicting the time frames. ie. Patients #54 - #58 have just embarked on their journey.
To-date (of last posting on the chart) there are only 39 patients that have fully reached the 360 & 450 day time periods.
You suggest that patients are moving up and down the chart as a matter of ranking and not just across the chart - what is the purpose or necessity of doing that? Why doesn't Patient #1 remain Patient #1, Patient #15 remain Patient #15, and so forth? Would it not be so much easier for laymen to follow any given Patient's path from start to finish and prevent 100 different analyses by our members of what is happening each time a report comes out.
Maybe my brain works too simple and tries to simplify as opposed to making something too complex for what it is.
Thanks anyway -- I'll just continue to follow along.