RE:RE:RE:TPST, a harbinger for TLT?Or the tech or the studies or the science is just not what they are making it out to be. I mean big companies can not be this stupid that they can't see it and not willing to pay a tiny amount if there is something really interesting going on. Like I said the science here are mostly backed by the company, the affiliates, and more importantly the Stockhouse qualified doctors. Lolololol. Anyone seen ScienFirst / Bencro yet? I worry for the board when the biggest promoter of over 15 years just suddenly dissappears. Did they pull the plug and finally got rid of him. I mean 15 years of 24/7 nonstop pumping by him and he couldn't even get the share price over a measly 0.30 pennies.
DJDawg wrote: Interesting history update. I feel for anyone who has been here that long.
I'm fairly certain that the main reason why it has not come to fruition yet is that RDW is too stuck on holding on to and controlling this oncology advance as his legacy. He wants to be the guy that recognized the science and made it happen. Any other CEO would have done whatever it takes to collaborate and get funds with bigger pharma.
I've said it before, that the science is amazing and what ultimate success will be despite the management not because of it. This is usually where someone chimes in that RDW was the only one to get this going. Yes. I get that. But there is more than one stage to success. Discovery phase, points to RDW. Everything after that.....not so much.