Post by
fredgoodwinson on Feb 21, 2023 3:35pm
BTD
Thanks Dawg - looks sound to me. Correct me if I`m wrong but you`re saying that the results of the next set are already known and will alter these percentages very little? This fact will surely not have escaped any of the relevant parties.
While these results suggest that the Company would be fairly granted BTD if an application were made now pitiful volume depth and momentum suggest an opposite dynamic. This begs the question as to what exactly is supposed to change for the better between now and the initiation of a BTD Application and exactly what is being said to the Company by the FDA to give it pause for thought?
Comment by
fredgoodwinson on Feb 21, 2023 4:02pm
Thanks for clarifying Dawg - that`s what I thought you were saying. The failure to make a BTD Application becomes increasingly perplexing.
Comment by
Eoganacht on Feb 21, 2023 4:20pm
Can't argue with that. 29.4% CR when the 360s hit 450 days and maybe 32% CR when all 37 patients at 270 days hit 450 days.
Comment by
Eoganacht on Feb 21, 2023 5:02pm
If we just supposed, (keeping excitement firmly in check), that the 3 IRs at 450 days and the 2 at 360 days were all reclassified CR we would be at a 450 day CR rate of 44% at the next update.