RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Mrt before rapid sxYet more dreamboating, there is NO hard data to suggest RSX is any more cost efficient at large scale continuous flow RE separation, period.
Do you people SERIOUSLY believe Lynas has been working up their massive 25ktpa plant for 7yrs without developing, improving, planning their next moves SX?
Lynas have been planning & developing their next moves processing particularly since 2016, incl a panel of intn'l consultants, and that very much includes the critical engineering alongside the chemistry.
Perhaps shouldn't say it but maybe it might be understood better, in private conversation a very senior individual told me recently they have studied ALL alt separation tech and are totally convinced they have developed the most cost efficient continuous flow at scale.
Now these people rarely say much, but when they do I rate them way above every glossy PDF, from every carnival barker, past decade, none of whom have delivered squat.