RE:Interesting timelineI truly believe that the lawyers and insiders knew exactly what they were doing with the news releases and consequences it would result from it.
Many invested in SJL based on the fact they had an offtake with Panasonic as described in the 2017-02-28 news release but it was not the case. Was it incompetence, intentional or an honest mistake saying in the news release that there was an offtake agreement with Panasonic? The end result, the shareholders that bought over 80 million shares in two days got screwed.
SJL changed their version after a halt with another news release that they are working at obtaining an offtake from Panasonic. How convenient. Didn't they know what they were doing the first time? Who profited big time?
All in my opinion.