RE:RE:Value creation at VRBI am not sure I said "commercially viable" but in my opinion the "historic" nature of previous work is somewhat a matter of semantics and exchange regulations. What Mr Bakker can say and what is known based on available data are two different things. Current and previous management appear to have been consistently hyperbolic in the language used in PR's and finally got caught at it.
I did say "something can be done with it" which would include but not be limited to in the short term of following Mr Girard's recommendations of completing a current resource definition and then a Preliminary Economic Assesment. My guess is PEA will say V only development has limited economic viability but if the TiO2 and FeO3 are thrown in that there is a possibility of success.
The obvious "something" is sale to the neighbouring Blackrock who appear to be succesfully on the way to building a mine - although absolutely terrible FeO3 spot prices are likely slowing things down - so if VRB continues to build value and not rhetoric, and Blackrock is successful, sooner or later someone will come knocking.... it is very possible that could be on the later side of the equation.
We could always have a vote....raise your hand if you thing VRB should lapse the claims at Lac Dore because there is really nothing there....