RE: tom konrad... interesting commentary from this chap;
a) i agree with his stance of the 15% dilution; unless and until more convincing info is forthcoming on the potential benefit of this investment i am 100% against the dilution. one of my specific issues is how much of the 4,000 MW will actually be realized; i suspect no where near what is being pumped
b) some of the commentary late in the piece is really beneath commentary' why is this guy writing about bizarre rumour and innuendo and then providing odd commentary on the rumours.. sad for tommy tom to write this and for that stuff i feel badly for jeffy, et al.
all in my opinion only