Western Wind Energy Corp V.WND

smear campaign

[Probability]

These two requests by Brookfield were moot. Firstly, Mr. Ciachurski was not involved in any of the meetings with Brookfield nor did Mr. Ciachurski speak with any of the members from Brookfield, either as a whole or individually during this process from the 17th. Mr. Ciachurski is also excluded from any of the Independent Committee meetings. Secondly, since Brookfield, as a major insider, is proposing a bid greater than $2.50, the Board of Western Wind has a statutory obligation to reject the preexisting $2.50 bid. That is a fundamental obligation to keep it's shareholders informed.

Read more: https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/1033480#ixzz2IvnMiZyM

[impega]

Brookfield threatened a news release that would damage shareholders (and the shareprice) unless WND mgmt. met their demands. Is their a name for that? Coercion?