RE:Galway Gold and CBJLunchisforwimps wrote:
Not making excuses but epithermal veins are notoriously difficult to 43-101.
They are not.
This is yet another ludicrous story that hurts the whole industry. CBJ has been carrying themselves along on a single, oblique
drill intercept (October 24, 2011) that was obviously drilled in that manner in order to fool the market.
How do you drill
114.98 m @7.57 g Au/t and end up with 123,000 indicated oz Au almost three years later? Simple, the strike length of your deposit was 114.98 m. Incredible.