Post by
SamDiego on Sep 04, 2023 1:47pm
Pandora, I have a constructive research tidbit for you
Pandora, because you are the longest existing shareholder of YFI that I am aware of, I can only assume that you are also the most patient.
It is apparent that for most shareholders here the assessment and feasibilty of our technology by the industry per se is paramount issue to be answered. Secondly, once there is an indication that this box is checked, what would be the next question to be of concern to youself and other shareholders? You got it! Timing! Well Pandora, judging by most posts, the time it has taken YFI to get to the stage it is presently at is not only late, but very late.
Therein lies our quandary Pandora. How do you determine what is early , on time, late or very late when it comes to YFI attaining the objectives it has set out for itself.?
Is there a prior example of any like tech vying for market acceptance and share in this industry that you can you for a comparative model, or template? If not, how can you define early, or late.
Let`s see if we can simplify this somewhat by starting from UpRamp because it provides clear evidence that we came to the official attention of a number of global service providers particularly for their assessment. So, in you studies how long should you expect this assessment to take based on past comparisons? You don`t have to answer that because no one can. Why? Because the product that YFI brought to the table was specifically designed for high density applications, particularly those that single channel wi-fi could not handle. Ouch, that answer of timing just got exponentially tougher to grasp especially because it involved the subjective, as well as objective response. If you read between the lines that was specifically outlined and defined by the performance results of the POC and pilot released in Mar 2021. Now, it is even more difficult to determine what effect Covid may have on this timing because of the fact it proved to be bitter/sweet.
Now if you were to include Cablelabs development of 10G during this same period you might ask yourself as to whether this also had some effect on the timing for licensing of our tech? And don`t forget the development and expectations of Wi-Fi6E.
There are definitely more things to consider including the knowledge that it takes a minimum of two to tango but, it should be sufficient for anyone to compare this to a like comparative model to determine whether YFI is early or late in their endeavors.
Is YFI early or late? Now, before you answer remember that it takes two to tango. Can it be that YFI is early but their tango partner is late? Maybe you would find it more appropriate to define any answer by defining the stage we are in. For example, if spectrum slicing gets adopted and employed by a service provider, are both YFI and the service provider now defined as being early?
Anyway, you have lots of time to do your homework. In this regard it is never too early.
Now for the sake of argument I just included more pertinent content in that post than the party you implied I was trolling included in his last 30 posts.
Comment by
leodevoe on Sep 04, 2023 5:40pm
LOL. Ya know how you know you're late. When the product you're hawking was built in 2002 and its 2023. In tech years wifi3 is 112.
Comment by
leodevoe on Sep 04, 2023 6:07pm
Oh, and single channel has 100% market share and 100% of the market are moving it forward. Good thing grampa is old and unaware.