I Personally Didn't Read Yesterday's Article....
Thing is, the writer showed transparency by admitting to the short. Isn't this similar to the pumpers here admitting to their holdings? lol
If it is wrong to speculate negative implications while short, then wouldn't it also be wrong to speculate positive implications, like there is enough data out there for this to be a mine at present, while being long?
Surely this is all just a game of course. This is not a war, it's a game to see which hype is better, IMO.
"As disclosed in this 8-page, single-spaced article, the felon who published it, established a short position on Zenyatta ahead of the article’s publication and stands to profit on any future declines in Zenyatta’s share price. Conversely, the same felon (and alleged mob associate who, apparently, was still on federal probation as of September 2010) purchased stock in three flake graphite companies heavily promoted in the article — Alabama Graphite, Big North Graphite and Northern Graphite — and stands to profit on any future increase in the prices of those aforementioned companies’ share prices".
- See more at:
https://investorintel.com/graphite-graphene-intel/55776/#sthash.nXIQExkP.dpuf