GREY:WFREF - Post by User
Comment by
Reflecton Dec 20, 2015 7:19pm
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0342-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
146 Views
Post# 24399847
RE:RE:RE:RE:Back To Square One
RE:RE:RE:RE:Back To Square OneUograd: to further rebut your explanation; you also imply that LRE’s CEO & BoD conspired with the Bankers in order to scoop 100 mil from MIE & that the deal was a farce. Also, because of inside info there is the matter of 7 mil shares recently dumped. Thus, these matters warrant an investigation into the deal making ordeal as you suggest - to defraud investors. If your theories are right, criminal activity has taken place.
After MIE has thrown egg in Andrew’s face & then the second time MIE throw’s excrement into Andrew’s face; you suggest that Andrew lick his lips & come back for more to make a third deal.
This whole thing is repugnant & I believe an investigation is warranted. We the small investors are being shafted. MIE entered this deal with eyes wide open & LRE has to fight to get the 10 mil.
If the Bankers did conspire with LRE to defraud MIE, then the law must be enforced because LRE was coerced or conspired to bargain in bad faith with MIE.