GREY:XEBEQ - Post by User
Comment by
Resilience19on Dec 19, 2020 7:15pm
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0341-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
196 Views
Post# 32148008
RE:RE:RE:RE:More on Hydrogen
RE:RE:RE:RE:More on Hydrogen@ace1mccoy, you're perfectly right. The idea should be to produce blue hydrogen, using fossil O&G and as a second step, capture the carbon released by the first step and send it back into the ground (carbon capture), technically turning the blue hydrogen into green hydrogen. Xbc, indeed, has the tech to do this. What I'm not sure of is at what scale, but where there's a will (and money) there's a way.
ace1mccoy wrote: As an Albertan I don't think we are disagreeing at all ,westcoast . But what you describe is a small RNG installation and that's a needed installation in a setting like that . Also let's not confuse RNG with Hydrogen. What Alberta is taking about is being in the top 3 supplier of Hydrogen in the world and building mega industrial cheap natural gas feedstock into heavy industrial conversion of blue Hydrogen. Mega projects excess of estimates 10-12 Billion USD for engineering , procurement and construction with on-site tradesman workforce of thousands.... For example a Fluor Engineering came to XBC and asked them to get involved or consult , possibly. Advantages for Alberta to build mega projects is carbon capture geography, caverns 2- 4 Km below ground level . Also building dedicated hydrogen pipelines is being discussed now. The scale up is what is being talked about in the industry. I'm a long and strong SH of XBC and am impressed with the recent M&A of XBC, I'm excited for XBC's future. We all should be! Glta