Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum CANEXUS CORP 6.5 PCT DEBS T.CUS.DB.D

Chemicals Specialty Chemicals

Bullboard (TSX:CUS.DB.D)

View:
Prev ... 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 ... Next
Comment by greenhawkon Jul 04, 2014 10:29am

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Blunderheim: Phase Two

Yup. all this talk about lousy management is irrelevant now. The board has tried to correct that issue and the question is how good is the new CEO.  Discussion time would be better spent in ...more  
326
Discussion
Comment by BlueCollar51on Jul 04, 2014 10:15am

RE:RE:RE:RE:Blunderheim: Phase Two

ocean112; As you no doubt know Kherson has a propensity to make “predictions”. Very few of them actually turn out to be correct and he is not very consistent (flip fops). On ...more  
325
Discussion
Post by jd43xlon Jul 04, 2014 9:59am

ocean112

Disregarding Kherson for a while, do you not admit that this whole NATO exercise has been one giant fckup? I mean, almost doubling the construction cost? It was touted as a great cash flow producer ...more  
360
Comment by ocean112on Jul 04, 2014 8:54am

RE:RE:RE:Blunderheim: Phase Two

I think it bugs you that you will always live in Nawar's shadow - with little credibility......to clarify - would rather read nawar's hard analysis - and even IF the outcome doesn't ...more  
322
Discussion
Comment by Khersonon Jul 04, 2014 7:15am

RE:RE:Blunderheim: Phase Two

Ocean112, I too did review the facts and so far, who has been right and who has been wrong? My prediction on Canexus was after a very deep look into the financials of the company and just as important ...more  
314
Discussion
Comment by ocean112on Jul 03, 2014 11:16pm

RE:Blunderheim: Phase Two

how does booting the CFO solve anything?  At this point - it would be a token gesture but I highly doubt the root cause of all the issues with Canexus lies with CFO....a CFO can't control ...more  
329
Discussion
Post by Khersonon Jul 03, 2014 10:35pm

Blunderheim: Phase Two

Glad to see that some of the Canexus Pump Gang are still around. But it must be getting harder and harder for some of you clowns to see any bright spots from the most recent CUS NR.... Reading between ...more  
512
Discussion
Comment by MOJOJONOon Jul 03, 2014 6:52pm

RE:Down over 7%

"improving financial flexibility" is pretty ambiguous as well.  Share issue? Dividend Cut? Asset Sale?
289
Discussion
Comment by otcmoonboundon Jul 03, 2014 6:12pm

RE:NATO value

Brilliant.  Failure to meet projected capacity despite endless delays and massive, repeated cost overruns.  But it's worth more now...  Here's the deal.  If it's really ...more  
400
Discussion
Post by jd43xlon Jul 03, 2014 4:34pm

Someone doesn't like the truth

Giving my posts a 1-star rating just makes the grantor look like a fool. How about posting a counter argument, if you can?
326
Comment by jd43xlon Jul 03, 2014 4:24pm

RE:RE:NATO value

That is a good question, and without that detail, the valuation is worthless.
287
Discussion
Post by jd43xlon Jul 03, 2014 4:22pm

Down over 7%

Well, that was fugging uckly. The market obviously doesn't believe NATO is going to get sold for a huge profit.
330
Discussion
Comment by JustforFun7on Jul 03, 2014 3:28pm

RE:NATO value

Is CIBC's valuation based on 6/7 train car capacity or 10.5 train car capacity? That's a 50% difference in that type of capacity for NATO. A huge difference. If they offer it up at only 6/7 ...more  
331
Discussion
Post by Spockhouseon Jul 03, 2014 2:51pm

News Releases

I have noticed that every time the company issues a news release, the stock price drops by 5% to 10%. Maybe they should just stop issuing news releases! :)
325
Post by snootchybootchyon Jul 03, 2014 2:47pm

Buy more or hold

Hi, First time poster here. I bought into CUS about 9 months ago at $7.40 for the attractive dividend. I have averaged down since then and have more than quadupled my initial position. My average cost ...more  
490
Prev ... 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 ... Next
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
{{currentVideo.headline}}
{{currentVideo.link1Text}}
{{currentVideo.link2Text}}
< Previous
{{moreVideoText}}
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities