Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

7936567 Canada Inc SWYDF

Stornoway Diamond Corp is a leading Canadian diamond exploration and producing company. Its principal business is the development of its flagship asset, the fully-owned Renard Mine, located in Quebec, Canada. The company intends to grow its business through the exploration and development of its mines. Stornoway also holds interests in a portfolio of exploration assets across Canada through owned properties and joint ventures. These properties and joint ventures include projects such as Adamantin, Qilalugaq and Pikoo.


GREY:SWYDF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by fourtwentyon Dec 01, 2006 11:35am
168 Views
Post# 11786883

RE: I want to know..stokpiker

RE: I want to know..stokpiker"Ive had several communications with SWY and have been misinformed by them, regarding the minority voting I was told beyond a doubt on several occassions that SWY had the votes to force a subsequent transaction so I might as well tender my shares, I tried to discuss with them the possibility that only the minority would be allowed to vote and without SWY getting 90% they would be forced to address the concerns of the remaining minority, but I was told I was wrong and to tender my shares cause in the end SWY would vote for the same transaction and force the minority to accept it well as you probably know by now, SWY was wrong, we might never know whether they where intentionally misleading ACA SH or whether they actually thought they where right (or maybe in the end it will come down to very bad legal advice)" I don't know exactly what your position is on this whole mess, but if you haven't already, you should forward your correspondance with SWY to the OSC and BCSC. It would probably help the position that SWY is purposely trying to mislead ACA shareholders.
Bullboard Posts