Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust T.SRU.UN

Alternate Symbol(s):  CWYUF

SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (the Trust) is a Canada-based fully integrated real estate investment trust. The Trust develops, leases, constructs, owns and manages shopping centers, office buildings, high-rise and low-rise condominiums and rental residences, seniors’ housing, townhome units, self-storage rental facilities, and industrial facilities in Canada. It is focused on development, ownership, management and operation of investment properties located in Canada. The Trust portfolio features approximately 195 strategically located properties in communities across the country. The Trust’s subsidiaries include Smart Limited Partnership, Smart Limited Partnership II, Smart Limited Partnership III, Smart Limited Partnership IV, Smart Oshawa South Limited Partnership, Smart Oshawa Taunton Limited Partnership, Smart Boxgrove Limited Partnership, ONR Limited Partnership, ONR Limited Partnership I, and SmartVMC West Limited Partnership.


TSX:SRU.UN - Post by User

Comment by JerryFrancison Jun 03, 2007 9:11am
284 Views
Post# 12883629

RE: Inferred vs Defined -Termight

RE: Inferred vs Defined -TermightRegarding the IR portion of your post. I do not yet know for sure how 'publically' effective Barnes McInerney is or will be. One thing that makes sense to me is that a PR company or IR department is only as good as the information the leadership chooses to release to them. In the case of Starfield, I would suspect that the company intends to put forth pertinent updates sparingly. They cannot accurately be accused of being hypsters lol. [I know the bashers can seize the moment here but so be it]. If a shareholder takes that the companys 'silence is golden' viewpoint in the negative then of course he or she will not stay the course if the stock heads south due to trading shorting etc. If however, an investors believes in the company and also believes that they have the goods AND also have hit on something new and noteworthy, then those people will be willing to hold steady. I am sure you have noticed that the last release was only a preliminary one. While it may have met all the requirements, [it did and more so to a careful reader] it certainly did not meet the expectations of many of the SMALLER stockholders. The reason for that of course is, that we did not get all the details and tallies [with ALL 2006 assay results] BECAUSE that report was not yet finished. That certainly does not make me a basher of the company BECAUSE I know these pro's do know what they are doing and we will get all the reports downstream [in their timing]. However, IMO, this could make for an ineffective IR department with regard to the decimination of info to the 'turnip farmers' like us. [lol] That does not mean that Barnes isn't working behind the scenes because I am sure they have been. Some of the recent volume might be courtesy of their efforts. Termight, like it or not, [I don't] this is totally a commercial play period and I have an idea that you know this to be so. Take care, Jerry Francis
Bullboard Posts