Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

North American Gem Inc V.NAG



TSXV:NAG - Post by User

Post by Kiktyreon Nov 22, 2008 6:50pm
696 Views
Post# 15604373

Cost Of Production, Saturn

Cost Of Production, SaturnI think it helps to look at the Chart for Historical Coal price in US by Region to gain an idea of what the production cost may be:
https://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/coal/page/coalnews/coalmar.html#spot


In the period between Nov 2005 & Nov 2007, the average weekly price ranges are:

Northern Appalachia: $40 ~ $47
Illinois Basin: $28 ~ $36
Powder River Basin: $10 ~ $21

It’s reasonable to believe that they were produced with profitability, and that give us a rough range (below the above prices) of what the ACC costs may be.

We can expect ACC to operate at higher than optimal cost due to the small scale and in contract-mining conditions. HHAPPY did mentioned some estimates in post “Just to refresh shareholders" on 10/01/2008 and I think they are realistic.

The most recent average price for Northern Appalachia coal was still above $100, so a likely gross profit of $50 is still quite healthy IMO.

KT
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>