Barker Minerals Ltd BKMNF

RE: Old song

[happyhiker]

Interesting that you would recommend people not blindly trust the management of a company, real people whom you can call and speak with on a regular basis, real people that can't hide.

Whereas you are so very reluctant to recommend that people not blindly trust an ANONYM0US Stockhouse poster, such as you and "da boyz" and every other "alias" on these boards, including me.

As you well know Chundie, successful exploration takes time.

You also know, that insider's buying, as has clearly been happening with Barker, is yet another strong sign. Though you seem VERY reluctant to discuss these FACTS.

Pair that up with the lack of selling over the past years, and again, yet another strong sign for the company and its shareholders.

People should most certainly not be naive and put blind trust in anyone, they need to do their own research and form an intelligent decision and take responsibility for their actions.

Taking responsibility for their actions. How do YOU and "da boyz" feel about that statement Chundie? Are you willing to come voluntarily come out from behind your "veil of AN0NYMITY" and take responsibility for your statements and your actions?

Personally, I'd be very surprised if you were.

Where your logic on these boards clearly lacks credibility, is where you've been consistently inaccurate information on this board for more than 2 years which always casts the company in a poor light, all while claiming to have "no vested interest."

If this were true Chundie, do you really think people would understand your tactics including the use of multiple aliases?

Chunderman (5/29/2002 | Post #5216826)
But don't be deceived by my number of previous posts, as I have other aliases

Bocaccio
12/16/2008 9:55:22 PM |  | 52 reads  | Post #25248996
ANONYMOUS , I know from the SRU forum under a different username.  CHUNDERMAN  posts as his cohort. Both, ironically,  use the monickers denoting the female gender, in addition to other aliases.

If you were a shareholder here, wouldn't you be all over a poster that claims to have "no vested interest" but resorts to your tactics Chundie?

If your claim of "no vested interest" were indeed true Chundie, why do you invariablly ignore any positive posts that you can't rebut, such as the information above, and the FACT that insiders have purchased $1,340,957.55 worth of shares in the past year alone?

I would "suggest" that the answer to this question would clearly indicate you DO have a significant vested interest in this company and its assets Chundie. And the tenor of your recent posts would indicate that you're quite concerned that your "vested interests" may very much be in jeopardy.

HH


https://www.willywizard.com/method_of_operation_of_the_profe.htm


4. Multiple Alias Posting

The suggester will develop multiple aliases, possible using more then one ISP or computers to try to hide his location. They have been known to go to Libraries or Internet Coffee Shops to use computers while running their bashing onslaught on a particular company. They don’t start out with a full frontal assault on the company or it’s shareholders. This full attack is counter-productive and hurts the image the suggester needs for their credibility. Therefore they methodically work their assault into high gear. Through the multiple alias usage the suggester will stimulate discussion to build supportive rapport with the reader. During this discussion with others the suggester will joke and play on a post board with others trying to win their following. All this slowly builds the credibility of the aliases. Once the suggesters have built the rapport with the posters of a board they start their premeditated onslaught of planting doubt with suggestive posting. This normally takes place by four or five aliases dominating a board wearing down the longs. They will also use multiple aliases posting to each other building each alias up trying to show the reader they are knowledgeable about the subject supporting each other’s views. At this point many longs that are easily influenced fall right into the trap set by the basher.


5. Planting Doubt

One thing that is very important is suggesters are not there to create a fast plunge in the stock price. By planting subliminal suggestive doubt about the ability of the company to make a profit day after day the share price declines gradually. The suggester does not want a fast plunge in share price because this might focus outright intent to damage the company and could be used in a potential future lawsuit by the company. Many companies are currently filing lawsuits and the main reason is share price decline that they blame on basher/suggesters posts on message boards. Suggesting a reverse spilt in high authorized and outstanding share count companies is also a method the suggester uses to plant doubt. Many investors have witnessed companies do reverse splits when issued shares reach the authorized allowance. Many of the small companies need capitalization and issue shares for working capital or to pay down debt. The suggester will always play on the reverse split issue. This is a given for the professional basher.

The reader will also witness the use of all caps in wording. This is especially true when reading post headings. The heading of a message is the first to catch the eye of the reader. The reader does not even have to enter the post to read the entire suggestive message. The heading has already subliminally had an effect on the reader. A few examples of this method of posting are headings such as: "SELL NOW BEFORE IT IS TO LATE!", "THE CEO IS A FRAUD!", ""THIS DOG IS DEAD!", "HEADED FOR THE PINKS!", "ABOUT TO GET DELISTED!", "SELL! SELL ! SELL!", "INSIDERS ARE SELLING!", "WHO IS DOING ALL THE SELLING?!", "SOMEONE IS SELLING, WHO?". THIS STOCK WILL TANK TOMORROW!", SELL THIS DOG NOW!"

These are just a few headings you might have read while visiting your favorite stocks post board.