GREY:BKMNF - Post by User
Post by
happyhikeron Dec 23, 2008 10:46pm
137 Views
Post# 15665279
For those new to this board . . .
For those new to this board . . .and in case any of "da boyz" or there groupies missed it.
I offer, once again, an excerpt from Barker's May 20, 2008 news release, which should go a long way toward explaining what "da boyz" appear to be up to, and the companies disappoint with them, and the serious response "da boyz" should anticipate, though the obvious risks don't appear to have deterred them from their quest! Not yet anyway:
https://www.sedar.com/CheckCode.do;jsessionid=0000XAHSFZsSWheBjBuE8xZ2ciU:-1
Prince George, B.C., May 20, 2008 – Barker Minerals Ltd. (“BML” on TSX/V)
. . . .
The Company also reports that it has been tracking defamatory comments being made in various Internet stock forums and recording irregular trading activity that is indicative of potential market manipulation. Appropriate legal action and timely reporting to regulatory authorities will be taken as warranted.
It would appear to me that "da boyz" think that "Mama Stockhouse" and the other boards that they infest will cover their sorry posteriors.
Sadly, for "da boys" and pleasantly for Barker shareholders, I believe this "defense" that they appear to so heavily rely upon will prove to be but a house of cards should the company decide to follow through above statement.
You really have to wonder what's in this for "da boyz" that they would even now, charge head long, regularly posting yet more inaccuracies and more infantile slaggage, in the face of this clear and present danger.
I have to assume that they anticipate a rather large pay day at some point down the line, a payday that will handsomely reward them for their many hours of labour, and their dedication to their cause, regardless of the low-life tactics required to achieve their goals!
Having said that, wouldn't that indicate the company has assets that would justify the pay day they so passionately appear to hope for and so aggressively appear to be working toward?
HH