Barker Minerals Ltd BKMNF

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals

As in our news release dated March 5th 2019 Barker Minerals Ltd. President CEO Louis Doyle states that: Barker is extremely pleased to be working in collaboration with such a fine group of worldly professionals scientists and institutions to further the understanding of the surface and basement mantle rocks of this highly mineralized and underexplored district. These groundbreaking scientific studies together with Barkers exploration efforts are forging a new modern understanding of the geology which significantly increases the probability of diamonds being discovered with an Archean age of the mantle material on surface being identified on the Tasse project area it further enhances the possible economic importance of this area by orders of magnitude.

GREY:BKMNF - Post by User

Barker Minerals Ltd

Bullboard Posts

Comment by happyhikeron Feb 01, 2009 10:51pm

101 Views

Post# 15744405

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: YAPPY: A BABE WITH NO REASON

Chunderman:
(1) I did not make an "assertion about the future results", but aprediction of the general tenor of the 4.6 m interval that wasdescribed in BML's news release as consisting mainly of iron sulfides.You are incapable of even quoting people correctly. How sad. In anycase, I stand by my prediction that this interval will be low grade (incase you didn't know, iron sulfides contain iron -- not copper or zinc).

Oh, ya, you did. On numerous occasions you have tried to cast the upcoming results in a poor light.

(2)You didn't buy low, you bought high (relative to current prices). Manyinsiders bought even higher. You are all trying to average down.Nothing wrong with that, but don't bemoan the fact that the SP is low,while at the same time jumping right in to take monetary advantage ofit -- HappyHypocrite strikes again! A wee bit disingenuous, nicht?

I bought low and lower Chundie. Thanks for letting me know that's not immoral, however, I didn't need you to explain that to me.

Are you attempting to sluff off your assertions on to me regarding "moaning" Chundie?

What a surprise!

(3)I have in fact posted a number of items copied directly from BML'sSedar documents, including financial details. But people should go toSedar themselves to read the documents in all their detail, as youyourself keep saying.

Indeed you have.

You've also tried to pass yourself off as an "expert" and a "professional" while posting garbage that is in no official document, such as your support of your pal N0NNIE's assertions about insider "BUYING" that you "ladz" tried to pass of as "SELLING. You also supported N0NNIE's assertions that "WRITE-OFFS" were actually "EXPENSES."

You also supported Schottchris's claims that he spoke with a drunken Barker official at a conference in Vancouver in January that is held in Toronto in March only a day after claiming Barker wasn't attending said conference at a function at said conference that Barker management didn't attend.

And let's not forget the doomsday you "ladz" promoted back in November that passed without further comment.

Should we again discuss your same-sex marriage fantasies that you composed in a pathetic attempt to discredit Barker management?

How about the infantile name calling? You remember don't you Chundie? What exactly were you hoping to achieve while inflicting these tactics on this board all while claiming to be an "expert" and a "professional," employing these tactics for better than 2 years and all while claiming to have "no vested interest?"

Just killing some of that excess, highly in demand, "professional" and "expert" time table of your Chundie? A little light entertainment between "professional" strategy sessions perhaps?

(4) it was another poster who commented on insider buying being selling. Check with SH. It is of no relevance to me.

No Chundie. Once again your memory is quite pathetic for a guy with your "self-proclaimed" ex-spurt-ise.

It was another poster that made the initial assertion, but you commented upon and supported the assertion a number of times.

Nice try though, most people aren't going to look it up to tune you up.

(5) Third party verification of WHAT? And who is the third party?

Call the company and ask Chundie. As you know, you and "da boyz" are living examples of why the information on these boards shouldn't be taken seriously.

(6)There must be some good information on this board, given that it comesdirectly from the company's documents -- don't you agree? However, younever post information, only false accusations. This makes it clearthat you know nothing about the company or the exploration business.You have lost money and now you are crying the blues. Well, what's new?It's the Venture Exchange.

Yes there is SOME good information here Chundie. The trick is seperating the garbage from the facts.

Also, you very rarely if ever share accurate information without significantly editorializing your point of view, which, as your history clearly demonstrates, isn't exactly unbiased or balanced and clearly indicates someone with a clear "vested interest" though you claim to have none.

(7) Show me where I claimed the properties were worthless. Another blatant lie of yours.

Now Chundie, you know very well that all folks have to do is click on your alias and then click on your "content" and then click on "go to archive."

I'm not sure you use the word "worthless" but beyond that, no slack to cut you on this point.

(8) What I criticized was BML saying in 2005 that they were going to explore Ace further, but not doing it.

That's taken you 2+ years? Wow Chundie, now that's commitment.

(9)I certainly hope you remember all the BS you have posted, but if not,it is accessible! In the meantime, how about providing a few examplesof "the garbage... clearly designed to mislead". Remember to show howit misleads! Hah-hah, good luck -- just like you can't find anyexamples of irregular trading.

And what examples of my B.S. are you able to conjure up Chundie? I've asked a dozen times and you appear totally impotent on the subject.

Have you forgotten once again Chundie?

I would encourage people to consider seriously that I, like everyone else on Stockhouse, may very well be full of B.S. and therefore anything and everything here should be confirmed. Why are you so reluctant to agree? Bad for business?

Certainly you and "da boyz," considering your desperate attempts to be accepted as "professionals" and "experts" despite the FACT so much of what you post is clearly garbage, are prime examples of this assertion.

Do you really think it would be wise for folks to take you "ladz" seriously when you often claim to be merely "jerking our chain" when you get caught trying to promote your "schtick?"

You play a dangerous game Chundie, but then, you never have shown any indication that you care much about your credibility.

Here's a few hard examples of your misleading garbage Chundie.

Now, I ask you Chundie, would people be wise to accept the assertions of someone that would stoop to the tactics clearly illustrated below without VERY carefully confirming said assertions?

Chunderman (5/29/2002 | Post #5216826)
But don't be deceived by my number of previous posts, as I have other aliases

RE: Hey Chund.