Barker Minerals Ltd BKMNF

RE: Where's the beef?

[happyhiker]

Let me clear something up for you Chundie.

I'm not qualified to assess these results.

I would strongly suggest that anyone reading these boards take it for granted that anyone posting on these boards is also not qualified to assess these results. For, even if they are qualified, the ability to hide behind their Stockhouse alias allows them to post whatever they like, whether truthful or not, to support their personal best interests, as I believe you "ladz" are a prime example of.

Though Barker has made it quite clear that they weren't testing the heart of the anomoly, Chundie, et al., have been trying to convince us otherwise for quite some time now.

Do these results, in and of themselves, indicate a commercially viable operation? Not that I can tell. Are they an indicator of good things to come? I don't know, but once the dust settles I think I'll be able to figure it out.

I do KNOW, however, that to rely on "da boyz," a group of thugs that have been doing anything and everything to try and discredit this company and have gone so far that they have attracted announced legal action, doesn't sit high on my list of reliable information.

Sorry Lightweight, anyone accepting the word of AN0NYMOUS low-lifes on Stockhouse as the second best place to gather investment advice such as you, and based on their silence on the subject the rest of "da boyz" would dearly love to have us believe, (second only to physically visiting the company's office) would make them a  prime candidate for the "Darwin Awards."

I suppose this means goodbye then right "ladz?"

Mission accomplished?

Obviously you believe Barker is dead and there is no need to expend any more of that "highly-qualified professional ex-spurtise," of yours right?

I'll believe you "ladz" believe this company is dead the day I see or flabby glutes disappearing out the Stockhouse door.

Until then? You "boyz" make an excellent contrarian indicator.

Thanks eh!

HH