RE: Happy & Critical ReadingIs this the official news release you are referring to Chris? If so it appears quite straight forward to me.
https://www.sedar.com/GetFile.do?lang=EN&docClass=8&issuerNo=00016564&fileName=/csfsprod/data94/filings/01362786/00000001/C%3A\SEDARFilings\barkerPRdec30FG.pdf
Prince George, B.C., December 30, 2008
Legal Action to be Filed
The Company also reports that the Board of Directors has authorized the commencement of legal proceedings against certain persons making defamatory comments in Internet stock forums, which may be related to irregular trading activity being tracked by the Company. The legal action is expected to be filed in early 2009.
Is this the quote from Mr. Doyle's email to me you are referring to Chris? Again, it would appear quite clear to me. Oh, and Chris, in one of your inboxes to me you mention that the legal action wouldn't be considered "material." I find this assertion troubling coming from a self-proclaimed industry "expert."
I would strongly suggest you and anyone else troubled or interested in Mr. Doyle's response to me contact the company and confirm said information. For, as I'm sure you are aware Chris, I would be taking a rather significant and unneccessary risk if I had written this response and was passing it off as the words of Mr. Doyle. Considering Mr. Doyle's assertions about "legal action" that would be very foolish. And, to be quite honest Chris, I'm not the least bit desperate.
Dear shareholder,
In regards to your question whether a lawsuit isgoing ahead as announced in previous news releases, the answer is yes, that theCompany is moving forward as announced. A lawsuit is material informationso if anything were to change it would be announced in a press release.
The number of inboxes you sent me yesterday alone, 17, is yet another clear indicator of just how desperate you
"ladz" are to bring anyone reading this board around to your way of thinking.
Also, your eagerness to debate the company's statements here, where you know most readers are not scientists, but the total unwillingness of you and
"da boyz" to contact the company and debate your concerns with them, are a sad indication of your true credibility and expertise. You really do embarrass yourselves
"ladz."
Why did you not respond to the following excerpt from an inbox you sent me on November 26, 2008 Chris?
Areyou happy with management? Are you happy with the share price? I doubtit. A lot of people want to see this changed and all you do is call usmorons etc. Why?
Fortunately for anyone reading these boards seriously, your attempts to appear cerebral and to pass yourself off as a professional are sadly lacking in credibility Chris.
Since your lengthy post is signicantly cleaner than your usual semi-literate tripe, though you've obviously carefully proofread your latest offering, you still couldn't achieve better than a grade 7 level. Not all that comforting coming for an AN0NYMOUS Stockhouse poster who claims to simultaneously hold down a job with Rio Tinto in the NWT while also working as an analyst for the Bank of America in an attempt to gain credibility.
Be thankful that Chunderman doesn't take it upon him/herself to mark up your post Chris, it would be a sea of red. Sadly you criticize the intellectual level of my writing and comprehension yet it would appear completing any sentence without an obvious error is clearly beyond your capabilities.
Unfortunately for you
"ladz" Chris, the amount of time you spend here, as your 17 inboxes to me yesterday alone clearly indicate, your pathetic attempts to mislead this board, as your
"doomsday" date back in November of '08 which passed without further comment clearly attests, while claiming to have
"no vested interest," clearly demonstrates the level of desperation you
"ladz" suffer from which would appear to have driven you to lower yourselves to tactics rarely seen on Stockhouse. Except, of course, by you same
"boyz" on a few other boards.
Interestingly, as time goes by and Barker continue to develop their projects, you
"ladz" appear to be getting more and more desperate, which causes you to post more and more nonsense, and causes you to lose more and more credibility. Under the circumstances, it would appear the trend will continue.
As you're aware Chris, but perhaps now would be a good time to clarify, I've advised people reading these boards to take nothing from these boards at face value without very carefully confirming it first.
INCLUDING WHAT I POST!
You see Chris, unlike yourself and 3 other posters who have invested significant amounts of time here over the past months/years while claiming to have
"no vested interest," I make no claim of advanced training or education. I am a shareholder of this company that has acquired experience by
"doing" Chris, and though I've certainly made my share of mistakes, have done very well investing in companies similar to Barker over the past 3 years.
Not unlike Mr. Doyle whom the Lightweight, yourself and Chundie, would have us believe is incapable of understanding geology because he doesn't have the same piece of paper hanging on his wall that you "ladz" would dearly love us to believe that you have. Unfortunately for you "ladz" Chris, your actions and efforts on this board have only served to erode the importance of this same said piece of paper.
It's not the piece of paper that counts Chris, it's what you do with it. And I've met several people in my lifetime that are much more knowledgable about certain subjects due to their personal experience and efforts to educate themselves yet don't possess the "piece of paper" than those that do possess the "piece of paper." After speaking with Mr. Doyle, and reading some of the publications he's written that have been signed off on by very reputable people who do possess the "piece of paper," I believe Mr. Doyle, very likely, fits in to this category Chris.
Having said that Chris, I would suggest that anyone reading these boards rely on Sedar, SEDI, company websites, and verifiable information from company officials when forming an opinion and making investment decisions.
To invest someones hard-earned dollars based on your assertions, assertions that Chundie and auContraire/Hozameen/Catmsan supported, of an AN0NYMOUS Stockhouse poster who claims to have attended the "PDAC in Vancouver" in January, which is held in Toronto in March, and claimed to have spoken with a company official that only 2 days before (though the company's participation was published in the conference agenda) wasn't attending said conference, only to track down a drunken company official at a function the company did not attend, strikes me as naive in the extreme.
Not to mention the significant insider
BUYING that you and your
"palz" tried to pass off as
SELLING, and the significant
WRITE-OFFS that you and your
"palz" tried to pass off as
EXPENSES, and your prementioned
"doomsday" scenerio that passed without further comment or explanation back in November.