RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: I'm very Happy!Yes I saw that too. If the have a "coalsignature" why go and drill on spots not showing the perfect signature?
Any gusses?
Can it be that they need to have these misses to prove resource showing the perfect "coalsignature". If they include
areas showing "coalsignature" but not yet drilled with this collected data it must be on the plus side in the coming 43-101. Or am I wrong here? Can the 43-101 include this indicated resource or is it just physically drilled areas that is going to be presented?
I wonder why the drill permits for Pine & Ballentyne take so long
From Sweden with love / Ben