Stock PerformanceI am a Bard shareholder who rarely posts on any thread. I have no background or training in geology or mining. I bought at .06 before the price runup followed by the falloff of stock price, which should tell you that I have held this stock for many years. I have never changed my original position in any way. Excluding short term traders who will certainly be disappointed in Bard as a trading vehicle, Mr. Beukman's performance has been very good in my view as set forth in recent postings. Short term traders seem to be immune to longer term factors affecting stock prices in the longer term. One example would be Mickey Fulp, the Mercenary Geologist. Now I am not particularly impressed with his "musings". However, he has posted an audio on Kitco, dated May 25 in which he specifically discusses Moly and Moly juniors and explorers in general. It is not favorable to Moly nor to the juniors. If he is right, and I do not know that he is, that would be an example of a negative longer term factor. Also, I held Aurielien which I bought at about .55 (cents). After the news of the big strike, the stock price went to about $4.50 but did not move for a significant period after that. During the period of stagnation, there was constant badmouthing of the stock on the threads. I sold at the latter price, after which it went to several times that value. I will never make that mistake again. I have little doubt but what Bard is experiencing a similar situation which is exacerbated by negative market forces, including difficult liquidity in general. Goldsoldat