RE: For Onadriis et alHello Baystreetkid, Ondariis et al,
You must be a kid, BayStreetkid.
After all you are certainly choosing to present yourself as some kind of adolescent.
“Verbal diarrhea”; one thinks not.
After all, the information which one determines as needing to be emphasized; shall indeed be emphasized, BayStreetkid.
“Follow my own advice”, surely you jest BayStreetkid.
One always follows ones own advice; you may want to try it some time, eh – you can bet your assets that plenty of readers do.
Moreover, the 180 ignores comment which BayStreetkid has elected to issue; well suffice to state that BayStreetkid could (in one day) be assigned as many ignores by posters who feel somehow threatened by ones presence and threatened by the possibility that one could “call a spade a spade”, if you will.
Furthermore, one is not, as you so foolishly allege, a “negative Nancy.”
One simply tells it like it was, is and would be, BayStreetkid.
It’s quite obvious that you and/or others do not entirely appreciate such uprightness, eh.
At the very least 403xyz1 has acknowledged that one had most definitely been easily able to stay ahead of what the Tranzeo “stakeholders”/representatives have been attempting to do.
When one decided to tell you that
.90 Cents would be the most logical interim bottom, did you consider that suggestion and all the supporting evidence to be verbal diarrhea – by the way, one told you about the required
.90 cent range while Tranzeo shares were trading well above the price which they are currently trading at, BayStreetkid?
Finally, ones “experiences”, as pertain to Unique Broadband Systems Inc and/or Look Communications Incorporated, do not in any way serve in clouding ones judgment; nor would such experiences hinder ones ability to seek out and identify the very skewed logic which may be underpinning the expectations or intents of a certain group of “stakeholders.”
By the way, Cannacord is referred to by some (myself in particular) as hosting those kinds of person who could be so inclines as to sell you on an idea or sell you a financial instrument which could very well be described as being as full as a Cann’OCrap would be. Simply have a good gander at the Canadian Asset Backed Commercial Paper debacle which Cannacord representatives had been intimately involved in.
Having stated the preceding information, let us now move on to the matter at hand.
(a) The Telus technical glitch shtick was not appreciated – and that’s an understatement
(b) This “Sword of Damocles”, i.e. the final conclusion to what could have been a long ago consummated deal and the issuance of either 25% of this Tranzeo enterprise venture or, to begin with, $400,000. 00 Dollars worth of ca$h; well, suffice to state that such ambiguity relating to unfinished business is not appreciated – they had better outright address and provide some color and clarity to such an issue during the conference call, eh.
(c) The issue of whether there is indeed a predetermined “need” to seek out and provide fiscal support for any Corporate Capital outlays going forward should be comprehensively addressed during this now rescheduled conference call
And the list can go on and on…
In closing, 403xyz1 et al should clearly understand that one does not now nor had one ever subscribed to the human mental construct called “luck.”
One knows of that which one seeks; and identifying that which one seeks is invariably not a problem.
Sherbet2