Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc TZWLF



GREY:TZWLF - Post by User

Post by sherbet2on Jun 15, 2010 2:32pm
171 Views
Post# 17190848

To Reiterate ...

To Reiterate ...

Aperto also issued US$400,000 of secured promissory notes on closing which will be convertible into common shares of Tranzeo if not repaid within 60 days of closing of the Merger at a conversion price equal to 83.33% of Tranzeo's market price at the date of the Merger.

 

Also note that following the close of markets today, it  would-be 5 days and counting.

 

Where is that Cannacord/Genuity analysts.

Doesn’t anyone want to emphasize forl bulletin board readers that those Cannacord representatives could-be perhaps expect to arrange for and handle some financial banking transactions on behalf of Tranzeo Wireless Technologies/Aperto within the next 6 months.
 

I don’t know about how you’d feel about being issued shares at a conversion price equal to 83.33% of Tranzeo's market price at the date of the Merger; and then standing by only to have the approximated value of such previously issued shares somehow devalued, due to a pricing of some future offering of shares to the market. 

One can tell you that one would not be pleased (and that would be stating it far too mildly, eh).

 

Once again, provided that ones calculations are not 4 days off the mark (yes, I had been off the mark previously), it "would-be" 5 days and counting.

 

What say ye 403xyz1 et al? 

 

Sherbet2

 

PS: Hmm; is that within 60 days from the April 16th, 2010, a.k.a. the completion date during which the final “closing” of the merger with Aperto had indeed taken place

 

 

 

 

 

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>