RE: RE: RE: Canaccord/Genuity lowers targetHello StockAddict1 et al,
One is not clear as to the concept which you would like one to explain, StockAddict1.
There are plenty of concepts; and the concept of “shorting” would be merely one long standing or long existing “derivative revenues” and “full service” brokerage house associated concept, eh.
Note: Please do recall that one may know relatively little about the concept of “shorting” publicly traded Canadian equities/shares.
Nevertheless, one could have previously recognized the potential for any existing regulatory restrictions associated with “shorting” practices to be perhaps quite easily circumvented in some way shape or form, StockAddict1.
Hmm; perhaps we should ask the “American Investor” (a.k.a. AmericanInv) or some other perhaps more savvy investors or “intermediaries” about the way in which dual listed stocks can be relatively easily “shorted” with the help of American based “intermediaries” and/or “others.”
Note: See ADRs and long existing “naked short” opportunities which exist due in large part to prolonged intervals associated with reporting and clearing periods over there within them parts, eh.
Given the pace set thus far, perhaps one of the only actions which Mr. Tocher would sense urgency for would be actions related to some requirement for himself and/or certain “interested parties” to support the “perception” being that certain company representatives have thus far been “out to lunch” or partaking of an extended summer vacation of some sort, eh.
You suggest that Mr. Tocher mentioned another 5 to 7 days for what would now be a 7 Million Dollar secured credit facility – would that be business days or would you also be counting weekends and holidays as well, StockAddict1, lol.
The credit facility being reduced from 10 Million Dollars to 7 Million Dollars …
Well, sufficed to state that such a development provides additional concerns which one would be so inclined as to discuss.
One such concern being the cancellation of a certain previously envisaged and just about secured 3 Million Dollars worth telecommunications equipment supply contract or contracts, eh?
You stated, “Tocher did meet the Q2 guidance, at the low level, 5.1 million, on the 5 - 7 million guidance level for Q2 with the USA not doing quite well and the small delay in Asia, now on track. What do you say if Tocher meets his objective of shipments and or revenue of the estimated 35 million in Q3 +Q4 ? What is your call on this ?
Response: Initially, you would do well to refer to the immediately afore stated commentary regarding the “reduced requirement” for immediate “operating capital” being secured by way of a previously determined 10 Million Dollar credit facility and then determine precisely how such a commentary relates to the commentary regarding the “small delay” in Asia being addressed and rectified.
Additionally, you would do well to understand that Mr. Tocher has, as one understands it to be the case, “struck out” during this most recent opportunity at bat – perhaps he’ll be allowed another chance; perhaps not.
Moreover, now reduced revenue expectations being met following Q3 or Q4 simply suggests or would confirm that the bar was indeed lowered, if you will; all this so as to allow for an easier and potentially more successful attempt at meeting the expectations which this CannO’Crap analyst and/or others had been supporting the irrational advertisement of.
A 17X price to earnings multiple being assigned to a company which just barely met (perhaps the accountants would have had to keep “burning the midnight oil”, eh) its previously issued guidance figures...
Well, sufficed to state that the market’s various participants would not be easily convinced to assign such a multiple.
By the way, could you have gathered any discernible clue as to the amount of ROI which could have been, in a sense, forfeited by common “peasant class” Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc shareholders, while holding this company’s shares thus far?
After all, it would indeed be quite obvious to one that Mr. Tocher and those CannO’Crap representatives could care less, eh.
As pertains to Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc, you now want to know one’s “call”, eh.
Response: Here’s a call for you.
PAINT IT RED, PLACE A 45 MILLION DOLLAR PRICE TAG ON IT AND PLACE THIS ENTIRE ENTERPRISE ON DISPLAY DURING AN ARRANGED “FIRE SALE!”
After all, the Intellectual Properties have been identified as being more or less worth approximately 18 Million Dollars; the contracts are only ever worth anything when you actually book the actual revenue/monie$ which are currently being associated with previously mentioned telecommunications equipment contacts and finally, the residual or perhaps somewhat "intangible value" which could be assigned to the remaining Tranzeo assets or underlying or base Intellectual Properties that Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc provides for this the current and perhaps “temporarily” branded Aperto/Tranzeo relationship would perhaps be, to some extent, only existing due to efforts undertaken by perhaps “master licensing” third parties, e.g. Wavesat, the as yet unnamed “American Aperto stakeholder” or “stakeholders”, etc.
Yes; Tranzeo certainly needs some “screaming news” for this share price to move up markedly. This much one will agree with, StockAddict1.
Be well and prosper
Sherbet2