Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Dianor Resources Inc V.DOR



TSXV:DOR - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by propertymadon Aug 28, 2010 8:12pm
316 Views
Post# 17393290

RE: Propertymad ...

RE: Propertymad ...Bishop got the percentage wrong heavy.... we are looking at about 1/3 of the leadbetter diamonds being type II

folks, typically type II would account for 2-5% of all diamonds globally...... type IIa as heavy pointed out account for 1-2%.... the difference between 'a' and 'b' classsifications relates to conductivity and manifests via different colour characteristics

the point of all of this ....colour, nitrogen, crystal structure.... is that Canadian average value is the lower limit for us IMO.... our average carat value will start with a 2 or a 3 infront of it...... thats why JR wont risk an unrepresentative valuation by WWW or anyone else for that matter..... he wants 5000 carats so we can blend all the colours, sizes, types and lithological units and emerge with a bankable average carat value
Bullboard Posts