RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: More Food For Thought, eh?Hello Freakenidiot StockAddict et al,
Freakenidiot stated, >>”Thanks StockAddict for posting this. I agree with you. To me it looks like he is interested in bringing this stock down. If not, please tell us what is your interest Mr. Sherbet?
Your post is just a repetition of what you said earlier. <<
Response: In short, ones “interest” is simply in witnessing Mr. James A. Tocher & Co actually doing what they clearly stated they would do within the previously and quite clearly emphasized timeframe.
Question: Where is the 10 million dollar secured credit facility which was to be attained before the end of the month” – see the statements issued by Mr. Tocher during the last most recent conference call.
Question: Who is this Indian telecommunications provider who is said to have signed a deal to have this Tranzeo/Aperto enterprise manufacture and supply telecommunications network equipment products for what is supposed to be a multistage network rollout?
Question: Is this American based “stakeholder” or are the American based “stakeholders” contented by being provided the very opportunity to have various “intermediaries” slowly collect and perhaps shift, shuffle, deal and re-deal (see the redistribution phase) Tranzeo shares at price points which are markedly discounted to the approximate $1.60 cent share price point previously established?
Question: Could it be the case that this American Investor or the various American Investors (a.k.a. “highly interested parties” who had collectively elected to “privately pump” upward of $200,000,000.00 million USD into supporting the Aperto enterprise’s “leveraging” of the Intellectual Properties in question during previous years of operation) could be more than just a little peeved at having the Intellectual Properties in question shifted, shuffled, dealt and perhaps re-dealt far away from their respective control?
You ask about one’s own “interest”; yet you seem to forget the various meanings associated with the word “interest” and concurrently “seem” to forget that the market’s interest in this Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc/Aperto enterprise has been “all too conveniently” made to wane.
Question: Why has there been no mention by Mr. Tocher & Co of exactly how many “insured orders” Export Development Canada representatives are prepared to have “underwritten” on behalf of this Canadian based telecommunications equipment manufacturer and supplier and the Canadian federal government respectively; again, what percentage of projected “receivables” associated with the current “backlog” of equipment orders are being insured by or “underwritten” on behalf of Export Development Canada and those stakeholders vested of this Tranzeo/Aperto enterprise?
Alas, plenty of questions and no answers at all to be officially issued by Mr. James A. Tocher & Co.
This entire enterprise would be considered by others to be worth the sum of its parts, if you will.
Intellectual Properties and what present more and more as being some kind of “vapor based suggestion” for other shareholders to wait for (see "wait and win") the next quarter are just about all that serve in allowing this combined enterprise to exist as a “barely viable” publicly trading equities issuer.
- $17 to $20 Million Dollars divided by the amount of outstanding shares (extremely roughly 50 Million shares at present) = an Intellectual Properties associated value of
.34 to
.40 cents per share
- Continuing and clearly established losses per share thus far adds
.00 per share of non-occurring “profitability”
- “Increasing expenditures”, due in large part to various costs associated with situating product development and manufacturing capabilities within foreign territories or markets, would possibly far outweigh any previous reduction in costs associated with a downsizing of North American situated (specifically, British Columbia, Canada based) manufacturing facilities and like kinds of maneuvers
- The very chance that “A Fire Sale” could provide the very opportunity to sell the now combined Intellectual Properties and this publicly trading equities shell to a perhaps “long interested” and currently privately operating suitor could be precisely what this group of “stakeholders” had previously envisaged as eventually occurring
- The very possibility that these Intellectual Properties and the combined publicly trading Canadian corporate vehicle could be on the move; this perhaps only after the collection and perhaps “redistribution phase” is allowed to be completed
Think about it. After all, one knows you can, eh.
Be well and seek to prosper.
Sherbet2