For: StockAdict et al.SotckAddict stated, >> “There is no doubt that Sherbet's questions have validity.” <<
Response: Yes one invariably presents valid questions, StockAddict.
Mr. James A. Tocher & Co does not maintain any “relationship” with one Sherbet2.
Mr. James A. Tocher & Co have, however, told one (in an indirect kind of way of course) that they are to some extent incapable of doing precisely what they had stated they would do before the end of the month; that was several months ago, StockAddict.
Once again, where is the 10 Million Dollars secured credit facility?
Question: What percentage of “receivables”, i.e. revenues expected to be directly derived from the delivery of specifically “backlogged telecommunications equipment orders”, is presently being insured by or underwritten on behalf of Export Development Canada?
What’s more, is there any relationship at all existing amongst this Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc/Aperto enterprise and those persons operating on behalf of the Business Development Bank of Canada?
Question: Does there exist any intention on behalf of the existing primary Tranzeo/Aperto enterprise “stakeholders” to allow for the steady “uptake” (by or on behalf of perhaps selected “intermediaries”) of an amount of Tranzeo shares; if not: why in Hades half acre are the shares being made to remain at such supposedly (one stresses “supposedly”) depressed levels?
1MrE stated, >>” Sherbet2 may be interested in bringing this down, but he makes some excellent points and offers many questions that have yet to be answered.” <<
1MrE also stated, >> “I think he held more than a few shares and is pissed that he took a huge loss.
If this suddenly pops then Sherbet2 was premature in his judgment. If it tanks soon then ...
Response: For the sake of all shareholders who had bought the very “shtick” which Mr. James A. Tocher & Co had elected to embark upon presenting to the greater market, one could appreciate an increase in share price which would have the precipitous and quite marked decrease in share price experienced by shareholders thus far seem as though it was merely a blip on the radar screen, if you will.
However, given what we all have been exposed to thus far and given the possibility that CannO’Crap representatives seem to have managed to mess up any previously existing opportunity, one possesses little to no confidence at all that this could occur within the next quarter.
After all, one could be expecting that CannO’Crap representatives would have little other recourse other than to seek to fold their particular tent and walk their carcases out of these particular camp grounds, if you will.
A wee bit of Speculation for ya:
Should CannO’Crap representatives be made to bring an offering of shares to market at a price any less than $1.60 per share (this being more or less the price of the shares that had been given to the American investor or investors), you’ll know then that this entire enterprise is indeed “ far too desperate” for a ca$h.
And we all know what invariably happens when a company such as Tranzeo, i.e. a company that is being made to expand beyond its borders and is being made to take on certain most serious players who are currently operating within the telecommunications equipment development, manufacturing and supply sector domestically and abroad, is made to become desperate for ca$h infusions, eh?
That’s correct. Invariably, the very vendor associated “stakeholders” (see the previous Aperto “stakeholders” who collectively funded the U.S. based Aperto Networks enterprise to the tune of upward of 200,000,000.00 USD) are invited to arrange financing initiatives on behalf of themselves and the perhaps intentionally ca$h deprived corporation in question.
Note: Some would suggest that there would be no way in Hades that 17 to 20 million dollars worth of Intellectual Properties would be allowed to be liberated from the perhaps ongoing influence which several fair sized American private equity/venture capital fund operators could have continued to exert; i.e. not unless the intellectual properties in question had not ever been outright owned by Aperto and had instead in some way been “lent” to certain “interested parties”/ “stakeholders” who had been making a go of it, if you will, within the grand old U.S of A, eh.
As pertains to Intellectual Properties development and the ongoing exploitation of said assets, do any of you know what “a master licensing agreement” would be fashioned by the ultimate owners of certain Intellectual Properties to provide for the licensee who would be holding such a “primary” yet not overriding Intellectual Properties associated agreement?
Let’s cut straight to the chase, if you will.
When is that which amounts to being a “Fire Sale” sign going to be positioned out on the front yard, if you will?
More speculation:
Perhaps these Intellectual Properties have been made to come back to Canadian soil and have been thereby intentionally inserted into a Canadian based Secondary Investment and Intermediaries operated Vehicle (see the Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc enterprise vehicle) by or on behalf of certain “primary contributors” to the very existence of such Intellectual Properties?
Perhaps the aforementioned possibility begs the following question as well.
Which Canadian “stakeholder” or Canadian telecommunications products and underlying Intellectual Properties “aggregator company” could have perhaps informally requested that Aperto stakeholders certainly seriously consider the immediate reintroduction of these Intellectual Properties assets into a Canadian based and yet internationally operating investment vehicle (see the “international” Indonesian telecommunications equipment development and deployment deal and the “International” Indian telecommunications provider associated deal, amongst others); moreover, to what end?
BE WELL AND SEEK TO PROSPER
Sherbet2