RE: RE: KBFR QuestionThanks Poolboy.
So if Kaiser does not provide references then I guess the answer is 'yes, his subscribers are just supposed to accept his writings as truth'. Maybe he assumes (and likely correctly so) that most of his readers will not put in the effort to verify his statements. Just like Fulp!
I have read a few TDLs (The Dines Letter) and they are filled with footnotes referencing articles, news stories, quotes etc. that Dines uses to formulate his opinions. It's easy to verify his statements! I would be apt to give more credence to the likes of Kaiser and Fulp if they supported what they wrote with verifiable references. Otherwise, it's just opinion and conjecture to promote their agendas.
But that's just my opinion.... =)
Now...back to work...lol...
Seven.