Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Fabled Silver Gold Corp T.FCO


Primary Symbol: V.FCO.H Alternate Symbol(s):  FBSGF

Fabled Silver Gold Corp. is a Canada-based company. The Company is focused on identifying new opportunities.


TSXV:FCO.H - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by dgh7on Dec 18, 2010 11:58am
516 Views
Post# 17866025

Inexcusable semantic fraud

Inexcusable semantic fraudThis is an open letter to the FMI BOD.

Shareholders are security holders."

Yes and no.

I have traditionally defined FMI shareholders as entities which hold a share of the Capital Stock of the publicly-traded company Formation Metals Inc. On a balance sheet, this always appears quite separate from a company's indebtedness from both short-term loans (liabilities) and long-term debt.

However, in Ontario the Ontario Securities Commission definition of "securities" include common shares, preferred shares, warrants and options. If you look in SEDI, you will see that insiders do not have to disclose any ownership of "securities" which take the form of either short-term commercial paper or long-term loans. I assume that SEDI treats debentures as commercial paper and not as Capital Stock.

The verdict: FCI is guilty of inexcusable semantic fraud. Perhaps not criminal fraud but certainly of corporate governance fraud. And why? To what end? What is the point of being a former teacher if one goes ahead and shoots oneself in the foot.

There ought to be no obligation on the part of a shareholder to contact FMI to obtain information/clarification on the purpose of the meeting and who is and is not a Security Holder. That obligation rest squarely with the CEO of FMI. In this instance, she has failed utterly in her duty regarding transparent corporate governance. I remind the reader that I have (and remain) a supporter of our CEO over the past six years. That does not alter the fact that the lack of transparency and clarity surrounding the upcoming meeting is totally unacceptable.

In short, what we have here is not a failure to communicate. It is far worse. It is,  in my humble opinion, tantamount to inexcusable semantic fraud. It is something which should never have happen with a former school teacher at the helm. It ought to be addressed immediately by the FMI Board of Directors. It is unacceptable corporate governance which is totally inconsistent a prior record of excellent corporate governance from this company.

If a rose is a rose, is a rose; by any other name, semantic fraud is semantic fraud, is semantic fraud. Shame on FMI!

Yours truly,

Douglas G. Harland.
(a loyal six-year shareholder)
Bullboard Posts