Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

St James Gold Corp V.LORD

Alternate Symbol(s):  LRDJF

St. James Gold Corp. is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral resource properties located in Canada. The Company holds a 100-per-cent stake in 29 claims, covering 1,791 acres, in the Gander gold district in north-central Newfoundland located adjacent to New Found Gold Corp.’s Queensway North project; and a 100-per-cent stake in nine claims and an option to acquire a further 100-per-cent interest in 19 claims, covering a total 1,730 acres, in central Newfoundland located adjacent to Marathon Gold's Valentine Lake property. Its Grub Line property is located 3.5 kilometers west of the town of Gander, NL. The Quinn Lake Property comprises two contiguous mineral licenses totaling 700 hectares (ha).


TSXV:LORD - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by goldsoldaton Mar 28, 2011 6:02pm
434 Views
Post# 18352337

Reassay

ReassayAlthough I am not entirely clear on it, could someone confirm or deny my current understanding of the ag results?   I believe what happened is the following: The old cores were originally assayed for Mo and Cu results with no thought given to Ag.   The old cores were subsequently assayed for Ag content and the bonanza grade result(s) reported.   Either because some non-Bard interested party wanted to be sure about the result(s), or because the cores were old as to time, Bard decided to reassay the old bonanza core(s), such that the latest news release relates to the reassay.   Any comments would be appreciated.   Goldsoldat.   
Bullboard Posts