Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mega Brands Inc MBLKF



GREY:MBLKF - Post by User

Comment by nerzaaon Mar 14, 2012 4:14pm
254 Views
Post# 19670288

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Q results

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Q results

you gotta to stop making assumptions on sensitivity analysis; it's a very dangerous logic, which will hurt you.

md&a quote: "An increase of 10% in the price of plastic resin purchased directly by the Corporation for its Montreal factory would have had an unfavorable impact of $2.6 million and $1.9 million on gross margin for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively."

read it as it is. the 2.6 negative impact from a 10% rise in price is on gross margin ONLY, not on net margin. just because the 2.6 is 20% of 2011 net profit 8.3, you can't assume the same impact on net profit going forward, doesn't work like that.

 

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>