Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Trelawney Mining and Exploration Inc TWNNF



GREY:TWNNF - Post by User

Post by diabase1on Apr 02, 2012 5:36pm
557 Views
Post# 19749948

A Comparison

A Comparison

Looking at a comparison between the results from Probe’s news release today, and Gold Canyon’s Springpole Lake deposit, and Trelawney’s Cote’s deposit news releases on February 27.

 

                        Total gold        Total Silver      Grade Au         Grade Ag

Probe

Indicated         3.5M oz           3M oz              0.82 g/t           0.7g/t

Inferred           1.5M oz           1.5M oz           0.7 g/t             0.7 g/t

 

Gold Canyon 

Indicated         1.22M oz         4.82M oz         1.26 g/t           5 g/t

Inferred           2.45M oz         11.58M oz       1.27 g/t           6 g/t

 

Trelawney

Indicated         0.89M oz         N/A                  0.88 g/t           N/A

Inferred           5.66M oz         N/A                  0.97 g/t           N/A

 

The above are based on a 0.40 g/t cut-off.

N/A means not announced.

 

I thought the above was an interesting comparison, leaving out all the other issues (including lakes etc). I believe that Gold Canyon, Probe, as well as Trelawney, may have their own water issues (lakes or creeks).

 

These 3 projects will have a tremendous economical impact on each of their locations. I also believe that each company are also environmentally sensitive to the needs of society within their surroundings. A large group of naysayers however, are standing by, and so they should!!!!   

 

Putting the issues aside, any comments on the released reserve comparisons?                                                                            

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>