Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

VMS VENTURES INC. VMSTF



GREY:VMSTF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Tamerackerdownon Apr 09, 2012 12:10pm
146 Views
Post# 19771659

RE: RICK MARK SHAREHOLDER LETTER

RE: RICK MARK SHAREHOLDER LETTER

LOLOLOL Like I said Axeman1l they have you brainwashed and believing anything they want, truth likely is HBM have several accountants hired just to  keep adding up the daily expenditures at Reed and in the end VMS will see
.00. Remember this all has to be paid back and will reflect bigtime when and if HBM make an offer , that's another reason I do not think you will ever see much more than a .50 offer from HBM plus the fact HBM paid .50 for thier shares. No-one is arguing the fact that Reed will be mined ,all I'm saying is VMS will end up with
.00 and they will have paid 30% of the exploration and possibly 30% of the  developement of the mine if they do not sell off Reed before  that happens.Like I said a long time ago VMS had the world by the tail before they did the kiss of stock share death with HBM for a measly 30%.

Bullboard Posts