Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

First Tidal Acquisition Corp T.AAA


Primary Symbol: V.AAA.P

First Tidal Acquisition Corp. is a Canada-based capital pool company. The Company's principal business is the identification and evaluation of a qualifying transaction and once identified or evaluated, to negotiate an acquisition or participation in a business subject to receipt of shareholder approval, if required, and acceptance by regulatory authorities. The Company has not generated revenues from operations.


TSXV:AAA.P - Post by User

Post by Karmanowon Apr 25, 2012 12:18am
637 Views
Post# 19832268

More Than Meets The Eye

More Than Meets The Eye

Both companies operate in Africa. AAA has a confirmed NI-101 Resource Estimate of 675m tons in the measured and indicated and within days of increasing that to over 1billion tons measured and indicated (3 times that of ELM). So, why are we getting a market cap of 40% compared to an African Peer without a Mineral Resource Estimate? Are they overpriced or is Allana underpriced? Twice the cash and twice the resource…you decide….hmmm

ELM: 243m sh / market cap $253m / Congo    /Cash $40.5m / 362Mt Indicated

AAA: 220m sh / market cap $110m / Ethiopia /Cash $70.0m / 675Mt  M + Indicated

The following table reveals some interesting facts with regards to cost per ton of production, operating cost per ton, internal rate of return till capex is paid off, estimated cost of total capex for mine build out, and method of mining.  The data is gathered from various sources (ELM website, Dundee Report) and is a reference guide and not conclusive. I included the average shipping for Sask. projects at $36 per ton to compare apples to apples. Some projects do not appear to have estimates available on operating costs or IRR, but the average cost per ton based on initial capex is available as a bench mark to industry. The average Capex cost per ton average for the companies listed in the table is: $1026 per ton…

Interesting when you apply the estimated $1.7b for Allana to ramp up to 2m tons of KCL per year…the cost of capex per ton is $850p ton..still in the lower industry average…

Average Capex/Ton for Selected Publicly Traded Potash Producers / Developers

Average Saskatchewan cost per ton = $1,029 per ton capex.

Capex/Ton                      Opex/Ton   IRR  Capex   KCL/Yr.     Mine Method

1,529  BHP Jansen Project        ----                      $12.0b    8.00m tons per year     Conventional 

1,500  Agrium Expansion           ----

1,178  Western Potash               $  98     22.7%IRR $3.3b for 2.80m tons /  year   Solution

1,113  Magindustries                  $125     ----

1,048  Karnalyte Resource         $129     22.0%IRR $2.0b for 2.10m tons /  year

1,047  BHP Burr Project            ----       ----            $2.0b for 2.00m tons /  year   Conventional

1,040  Encanto Potash               $104     24.0%IRR $2.4b for 2.50m tons / year   Solution

   996   K+S Germany Legacy    $101     30.1%IRR $3.25b for 2.86m tons / year

   930   Elemental Resources    $ 99       ----                      for 1.70m tons / year  Conventional

   900  Passport Potash              ----       (pending drilling results)

   837  IC Potash                           $147     26.0%IRR $706m for 0.80m tons /  year   Solution

   796  Allana Potash                   $  90     36.8%IRR $800m for 1.00m tons / year    Solution

   790  Verde Potash                    $ 273      23.7%IRR $654m  for 0.60m tons / year Solution

   667  Prospect Global Res.       ----                   158m tons M+I                               Conventional

These costs become very relevant in due course as deals and investments are considered. I present a brief review of another African Potash Junior as an example of comparing the underlying value of Allana and to consider why our share price is at .50 cents per share?

Elemental Resources ELM has similar characteristics to Allana is many ways:  Democratic Republic of Congo – west coast of Africa – Kola Deposit with 362m tons Indicated + 442m tons Inferred, (the Congo with the stable government), 256m shares outstanding with 40% in friendly hands, 40m cash on hand, resource at 275m deep, proposing a Conventional Mine with 1.7m tons of KCL per year and a 20 year mine life with Brazil as the planned market with first production in 2015. Pending 47 drill hole results from phase 2 drilling. Elemental has a current market cap over $250 million….

When you apply various valuation methods it becomes clear how undervalued AAA is or how overvalued ELM is…you decide which?

E/V – Enterprise Value: 362m tons ELM versus 673m tons AAA x KCL % = 108m tons ELM versus 134m tons AAA. $330 m market cap / 108m tons = $3.05 value per ton M+I for ELM and $170 m market cap / 134m tons = $1.27 value per ton M+I for  AAA. When you apply the current market valuation of ELM per ton against AAA ($3.05 x 134m tons M+I = $408m / 220m shares = $1.85 per share for AAA. This does not include a premium for AAA having $130 less cost per ton in capex, $30m more in cash on hand, and 30m less shares outstanding.

In the latest Dundee Report (page 5 exibit 3) we can also see a further variance in the Price per m tons and for the Enterprise Value: AAA has a current $3.63/m tons for M+I versus ELM having $8.14/m tons for M+I.  So, when by next week the calculation will change with the 50% increase in M+I tonnage. 134m tons current + 50% = 210m tons x $1.27 current market value for AAA tons = $255m / 220m shares = $1.16 per share AAA

When you apply the ELM current market value per ton it gets interesting…

 210m tons x $3.05 = $640m / 220m shares = $2.91 per share AAA next week all things considered equal

Unless someone can show a logical or rationale explanation as to why AAA does not get the same value as ELM…I am convinced that in time the market has to respond…considering African apples to African apples… and with the pending catalysts and milestones we are going to achieve over the next few weeks, months and for 2012…Someone is going to ask “why is a company with $70m in the bank and operating costs under $100 per ton…with capex under $800 per ton and with an IRR which is the best in the industry at 36% trading at .50 pennies…am I missing something or is this the agricultural investment of 2012? Or do some BIG hands want the share price kept low for some reason?

Bullboard Posts