RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Bang or bust, vein 22 I'm not sure who you're responding towards, true55, but find it interesting that you posted the exact same thing on six other boards. If it was me you were referring to...All my posts on this or any board are facts or based on facts that are drawn directly from sedar, CNW, etc.
Rather than post accusations and insinuatons, why not attempt to disprove my comments with facts and references for those facts. I'm open to discussion / debate. Should you prove my comments to be incorrect, I will gladly recant them and provide an apology to the board.
In reference to your post, you stated, "...call pkl you will find out when all is said and done there will be 6 million oz of Gold..."
Please inform the board who specifically gave you those numbers. I'd be curious to know who in the company is publicly (to shareholders) projecting a 376% increase in the gold resource when that resource is still only inferred, an inferred resource of 1.26 million ounces. As stated in the last nr, the company's priority is to prove up this resource - in other words upgrade the inferred 1.26 million ozs to a drill indicated / measured resource. Essentially the contained ounces will remain approximately the same; however the drill density will need to increase (whether surface or underground), and thereby increase the confidence of that stated resource turning it to indicated, measured or proven (if underground) which will be necessary to ever advance the project further (i.e. a feasibility study).
Have a good evening.