Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Seafield Resources Ltd V.SFF



TSXV:SFF - Post by User

Post by falcon Jun 21, 2012 7:26pm
428 Views
Post# 20041727

value comparison

value comparison

Extorre was bought for their main deposit which roughly works out to 170 dollars per ounce of gold (equiv). That is not a bad price to pay when gold is above 1,500/oz.

Of course if Seafield were given such a valuation we would be at 340 million dollar market cap!

However, it is important to realize that the infill program must continue so that SFF gets a better $/oz value. And like our deposit Extorre started finding a higher grade zone within the boundaries of the deposit. If we can continue to define such a zone the mining scenario becomes much more feasible and profitable.

So far we hit 10m of nearly 12g/t and 26m of 3.8 g/t Au which I am hoping is contained within a relatively continuous domain within the 200m to 300m depth levels. As one mines deeper it gets more expensive so if the grade goes up at that level it would really add to the attractiveness of the deposit.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>