Also CSQ has a problem... historical hole BRU95-009 was a dud. This was right beside 1201 and 1202 (1201 must have hit the vein(s) down the middle along the steep dip to get the lengthy strike). Funny how they compare CSQ to GQC. It's like comparing grape seed to a grapefruit... So most likely that true width of 60m is MUCH much less (how they can ascertain the true width with one hole is absurd and needs scissor holes to determine it). As this is NOT a carlin style deposit, but most likely a vein deposit, you need kilometers of this stuff to actually have adequate tonnage. Even though the HYPE is strong with this one, I would not touch CSQ with a ten foot pole and to sell GQC to buy it is plain absurd...